About Me

Hi and welcome to my blog!
My name is Debbie Morris.
I am currently a Career Technology Coordinator
at our local high school. I am a Walden University
student. This blog was created as part of my
coursework for Walden University. I hope you
enjoy my blog!

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Elements of Distance Education Diffusion

Blog post
Elements of Distance Education Diffusion
Debra Morris
June 28, 2011

Of the three elements of distant education, I have chosen to discuss the element of communication. According to George Siemens (2008) there is a growing acceptance of distance education in today’s corporate and educational arenas.  He states that this growing acceptance is due to meaningful relationships of communication, practical experience with new tools, comfort with online dialogue, and the ability to communicate with diverse and global groups (Siemens, 2008).  He makes a very important point when he states that learners need to be comfortable with the online environment. I agree with his views. As society has become accustomed to online communication, its popularity has grown.  Distant education has evolved from the beginning stages of broadcasting through means such as the radio and cassette to the current use of the web.  It has evolved and older generations have become accustomed to the elaborate differences seen in online communication as compared to face to face communication.

The following are blog post that share interesting thoughts on the subject.

Taryn Hailstock (Hailstock, 2010) shares in her blog the evolution communication has made from the not so long ago telephone conference, to the live meetings through Skype.  She includes the growth of communication, the types of social networks and the affordability of communication tools.

Embry (Embry, 2006) has a blog post tracking the history of communication. His post is very detailed and extensive. He begins before 1900, with the communication used during the time of the Roman Empire, and ends with student’s current use of personal computers and the web.  Communication has evolved and will continue to evolve as technology continues to change.

In another blog post by Randfish (Randfish, 2006), the negative effects of online communication are discussed. Randfish reflects upon reading he has recently done from John Suler’s, “The Psychology of Cyberspace”.  He references the author’s view of disadvantages in the use of online communication and the style of online communication. Two of the five listed were interesting to me.  These include; no one knows who anyone is and offline reputations have little bearing on the respect received (Suler 2004).  I have to agree with these two comments made by Suler.  The blog posted by Randfish includes his view that these negative aspects can be ruled out. I agree with Suler that the communication you experience online does not allow you to know the person in the same way you would in a face to face situation.  I also agree that your reputation is totally unknown by the people in your online community.
Another blogger, Christine Rand, states that improvements in online communication tools have greatly enhanced her educational experience (Rand, 2010).  She goes on to say that she is able to quickly find clarifications to things in question and while in this process she finds pieces of information that are useful.  She feels that the instantaneous connection with a professor or other classmates at any time is more useful to her than waiting for the weekly class meetings (Rand, 2010).
Today we have seen an explosion in the variety of communication tools available.  These include; face book, chat rooms, email, Skype, Wiki spaces, blogs, Myspace, Twitter, and instant messenger.  Society is experiencing a close between the gaps that exist in the comfort zone of communicating online.   My generation and older generations have watched and lived through the transition of face to face communication to the current and popular online communication. These generations experienced a large gap between the desire to communicate online and the comfort of communicating online.  Fortunately, this gap is closing and more and more people are enjoying the benefits of online communication.

Embry, B. (2006). The evolution of distance learning in higher education. [Web log comment]. Retrieved June 26, 2011 from http://distance-edu.blogspot.com/

Hailstock, T. (2010), Elements of Distant Education Diffusion [Web log comment].
Retrieved June 26 from http://tarynhailstock.blogspot.com/

Hart, J. (2010, June 25). Janes’ pick of the day. [Web log comment].
Retrieved from http://janeknight.typepad.com/

Laureate Education, Inc & Siemens, G. (2008). Principles of distance education. [Vodcast: The future of distance education]. Baltimore: Author.

Rand, C. (2010, June 29).  Christine Rand’s Walden Blog [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://walden-crand.blogspot.com/2010/06/module-2_29.htmlhttp://walden-crand.blogspot.com/

Randfish, (2006). Evolution of Communication on the Web. Retrieved June 26, 2011 from http://www.seomoz.org/blog/evolution-of-communication-on-the-web

Suler, J. (2004).CyberPsychology and Behavior. Retrieved from http://users.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/disinhibit.html

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

The Next Generation Of Distance Education

Higher education lacks good instructional design for effective learning in distance education, according to Moller, Huett, Foshay and Coleman (2008).  This is primarily due to faculty lacking appropriate training in instructional design or distance education.  In the articles written by Moller (2008) and Huett, Moller, Foshay, and Coleman (2008), K-12 has the least research and affects a variety of learners.  As a second grade teacher, I agree with these authors on their opinion of faculty lacking appropriate training in design and distance education.  Teachers are very often left to design and facilitate technology with which they do not even know where to begin.  A teacher cannot address best practices for how a student learns or which technology is appropriate for the learner when he/she doesn't have proper training.

Simonson (2000) states that there has continued to be a rapid growth in on line learners.  There are currently an estimated 6 million learners and this number continues to climb.  He notes that distance learning will not take the place of traditional education.  He states that it will stretch across and affect all learning environments.  Each industry of learners has different needs.  Instructional design will continue to evolve and meet the needs of all distance education learners.

It is imperative that professors and teachers are taught design and reflect upon learning theory.  By taking these steps, maximum learning opportunities are provided for the student. 

Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web (Part 1: Training and Development). TechTrends, 52(3), 70–75. Use the Academic Search Premier database, and search using the article’s title.

Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web (Part 2: Higher Education). TechTrends, 52(4), 66–70. Use the Academic Search Premier database, and search using the article’s title.

Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. & Coleman, C. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web (Part 3: K12). TechTrends, 52(5), 63–67.Use the Academic Search Premier database, and search using the article’s title.

Simonson, M. (2000). Making decisions: The use of electronic technology in online classes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84, 29–34.